🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord created to protect females from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The final authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the legislation for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence similar discussions in additional member states